Human Content Vs AI Generated Content

AI-generated graphics might not be the best fit for a pet site, especially since they’ve always relied on human-created artwork and coding.

A pet site launching with AI-generated graphics likely wouldn’t be well-received or widely praised, as the community values the unique touch that human artists bring.



There are plenty of talented artists in this industry who can bring a pet site to life without needing AI. That said, if a developer chooses to use AI-generated graphics, it’s ultimately up to them how their game is received by the community.



While AI has its uses, especially among app developers and those aiming to push out content quickly, it’s not always the ideal choice.

Human-written and human-created content will almost always perform better than AI-generated alternatives, especially in terms of authenticity and SEO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baw$e
Baw$e said:
What's your thoughts on unique/human generated content vs AI content?

I'm always going to prefer unique content that's written by humans, and I strongly believe it's better for SEO. I also think AI can benefit a virtual pet site if implemented nicely.
Click to expand...

Human generated content will always supercede. The emotions, the style, and the push are always different from what you see from Ai generated content, which most of the time makes use of just one style.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom